‘Making a bad situation worse’: 15% of psych beds lost in 4 California counties after staffing rule 

Advertisement

California’s new nurse-to-patient staffing ratios at acute, freestanding psychiatric hospitals took effect June 1, and in the early days of implementation, 65 beds — roughly half of them youth beds — across four counties were closing in the state. Facilities struggled to hire and onboard enough qualified nurses to meet the new requirements, and leaders have raised alarms.

The emergency regulations require psychiatric facilities to staff at least one licensed nurse for every six adult patients and at least one licensed nurse for every five patients younger than 18. Hospitals that fail to comply face fines of $15,000 for a first violation and $30,000 for each subsequent offense. Otherwise, patient capacity must be temporarily reduced until the hospital can meet staffing requirements.

According to a June 9 California Hospital Association statement, the counties that closed beds were Kern, Contra Costa, Madera and San Diego, with each losing an average of 15% of their acute psychiatric beds. Contra Costa was hit hardest, losing 29%. 

“It’s like the flip of a switch occurred on June 1. Up until now hospitals have safely treated hundreds of thousands of patients every day,” Kirsten Barlow, vice president of public policy for the California Hospital Association, told Becker’s. “Now suddenly the staff pattern needs to look very different, and in order to avoid a massive financial penalty, their only choice really is to close beds, even [though] they recognize how important their resources are to the community, patients and emergency rooms.”

The ratio regulations could cost more than $145.2 million statewide, including $107.7 million in salaries and benefits and $37.5 million in recruitment, training and onboarding costs, according to a March 6 letter from the California Hospital Association to state officials. No direct government funding is attached to the implemented ratios. 

Shortages on top of shortages 

California already faces a deficit of psychiatric inpatient capacity. The state has approximately 7,000 psychiatric beds — roughly 2,000 short of demand for adults. For children and adolescents, an estimated 1,800 additional beds are needed to meet demand, with youth psychiatric beds existing in just 15 of the state’s 58 counties.

The 35 hospitals affected by the new ratios provide more than half of California’s psychiatric inpatient capacity, meaning even modest reductions in their operations carry outsize consequences statewide, Ms. Barlow said.

“We’re making a bad situation worse,” she said. “Sadly, [youths] and their parents are waiting in the emergency rooms for several days, and sometimes when that first bed opens up, it means a six-hour ambulance ride to get to that facility.”

At Walnut Creek, Calif.-based John Muir Health, the system was forced to temporarily close 21 psychiatric beds, effective June 1, including a 10-bed child psychiatric unit serving patients younger than 12 and an 11-bed adult psychiatric unit — a direct result of California’s emergency nurse-to-patient staffing ratio order.

The moving target: Compliance 

Hospitals have moved aggressively to comply. As of mid-May, they had hired more than 1,100 new licensed nurses in total, with several hundred positions still to fill. But the pace of hiring has collided with the realities of a nationwide nursing shortage, an especially small pool of nurses with psychiatric experience, and the necessary training new hires require before they can be counted in the ratio, Ms. Barlow said.

About half of the state’s acute psychiatric hospitals are in counties identified as a Registered Nurse Shortage Area and/or Licensed Vocational Nurse Shortage Area, according to the California Department of Health Care Access and Information. The 2025 NSI National Health Care Retention & RN Staffing Report found registered nurse turnover averages 16.4% nationally, with more than 1 in 5 newly hired RNs leaving within their first year. 

Twenty-four of the 35 affected hospitals applied for flexibility waivers — known as Program Flex in California — signaling how broadly compliance concerns spread. As of early June, only about 12 had received approval, with the flexibility granted being narrower than hospitals anticipated. While the California Department of Public Health had indicated waivers of up to 12 months were possible, most hospitals are receiving only a few months of relief and are being told to reach full compliance by September, Ms. Barlow said.

The hospital association asked the health department to allow formal extensions for hospitals unable to meet the staffing requirements by June 1. The department said no extensions had been granted — though the flex waiver process does allow for limited, time-bound flexibility in how staff can be counted during specific shifts, such as permitting mental health workers or counselors to fill ratio slots during meal and rest breaks.

New nurses, lost experience

Perhaps the most acute concern is connected to the trade-offs hospitals are being forced to make.

To meet the ratios, many hospitals are letting go of experienced behavioral health technicians and mental health counselors, positions not counted under the regulations. These workers, many with years or decades of experience, are being replaced by freshly hired nurses, in many cases recent graduates with no psychiatric training, Ms. Barlow said.

“It’s been really challenging, and sad,” she said. “Long-term dedicated employees who have been doing direct patient care for many of them their entire career with a population that can be really challenging and very stigmatized. It’s really upsetting to many of our hospital leaders to have to let those folks go in lieu of hiring what might be brand new nurses who may not even be willing to stay once they really understand not only the population they’re now going to be working with, but the duties they now have to cover.”

In the first weeks of the new regulations, hospitals have reported dozens of nurse resignations, including newly hired staff who struggle with the tough realities of psychiatric care. On the other side of the spectrum, experienced RNs who have worked in these hospitals for years are now being asked to do work that falls below their licensure level. With a nationwide nursing shortage, those nurses have no shortage of options elsewhere, Ms. Barlow said.

She described the challenge of retaining even experienced nurses under the new model. 

“One of our hospitals talked about the move to simply change where the nurses’ station was located to be closer to a patient care area, and ask nurses to get out of the nurses’ station and be in the treatment milieu with patients throughout the day was not something they wanted to do, and resigned,” she said. “So it’s really some of those simple changes that can become a huge dissatisfier for nurses who’ve even been working in that environment, just with a completely different set of responsibilities.” 

The replacement problem runs deep

Unlike medical-surgical settings, psychiatric hospitals cannot easily plug staffing gaps with travel nurses, Ms. Barlow said. Psychiatric patients are engaged throughout the day; the environment requires deep familiarity with suicide-prevention protocols, de-escalation techniques, involuntary hold procedures and patients’ rights law — expertise that is hard to supply on a temporary basis. 

The counselors and mental health workers who are now being phased out provided something less medically oriented and harder to quantify: time and relational presence with patients.

“Many of the mental health counselors and workers talk about how one of the most important things they do is really provide space and time that other staff don’t have,” Ms. Barlow said. “We’ve heard many stories of folks who — maybe a patient got some awful news that a family member died — it’s that mental health counselor or worker who on the spot can sit with that person and just talk and be there as a sounding board. Typically, the registered nurse is not going to play that role and sit on the ground in a patient’s room and be there for them to talk about their feelings.”

Although hospitals have struggled to implement the new staffing ratios, National Nurses United has come out in favor of the changes. The union represents more than 100,000 nurses across California. 

According to a June 1 news release from National Nurses United, California nurses celebrated the “long-awaited safe” nurse-to-staff ratios, stating they should “dramatically improve the care behavioral health patients receive” and “saves lives.” The release also said CNA nurses “must remain vigilant during the permanent rulemaking process to prevent industry pressure from weakening these staffing standards.”

A policy question with no easy answer

The CHA has urged the health department to broaden its interpretation of which staff can be counted in the ratio. The hospital association said the department has taken an unnecessarily narrow view of the law by limiting the ratio to licensed nurses and argues regulators had room to be more inclusive. The health department has not shifted from that position, Ms. Barlow said. 

The CHA said it is tracking bed closures and their impact on emergency department boarding times, and it expects long-term challenges in retaining the more than 1,000 new nurses hired into California’s psychiatric hospitals.

Ms. Barlow noted that California is the only state to have implemented numerical nurse-to-patient ratios specifically for psychiatric hospitals, and said that in other states where similar measures have been attempted, they have typically been driven by nurses’ unions. She added that even national nursing associations acknowledge that training, staff mix and staff commitment are stronger predictors of patient safety than any specific number. 

“We’re not aware of any research — in fact, even national nurses associations point to the fact that who’s doing the work, what their training is, and the skill mix among your staff are far greater predictors of patient safety and high-quality care than any numerical number,” she said. “There’s nothing magical about one to six or one to five in terms of nurses to patients. It’s really about the training, the compassion, and the commitment that the staff you have brought to the job.”

At the Becker's Fall Behavioral Health Summit, taking place November 4–5 in Chicago, behavioral health leaders and executives will explore strategies for expanding access to care, integrating services, addressing workforce challenges and leveraging innovation to improve outcomes across the behavioral health continuum. Apply for complimentary registration now.

Advertisement

Next Up in Government & Regulation

Advertisement